Latest Events

Donate to SCND

Amount to donate:
£  GBP  

ScottishCND It is clearer than ever that no nation should be using nuclear weapons - Archbishop Tartaglia at Faslane
... 22 hours ago.
ScottishCND Disappointing response from Johann Lamont (Scottish Labour) regarding Trident, yesterday at the STUC Annual Congress
... 1 day ago.
CNDuk Do we want to be the kind of country that looks after vulnerable ppl or spends £100bn on WMDs?
... 2 days ago.
ScottishCND STUC points out Lamont's poor performance on Trident #indyref
... 2 days ago.
CNDuk Whether or not Britain should replace Trident is "a debate the Govt can no longer ignore" says @kate4peace2014
... 3 days ago.
Nae nuclear weapons here
Add your pin to the map and say No Nuclear Weapons Here.
Trident and Independence
Referendum is an opportunity for nuclear disarmament (PDF)
Spring Walk
Spring Walk
Edinburgh to Faslane on 1-7 April

Malloch-Brown questions Trident

ImageThe Foreign Office Minister Lord Malloch-Brown has questioned whether the Government should be replacing Trident. He was speaking to the Telegraph only days before he steps down from his post.  The newspaper says that he "questioned the value of Britain’s planned £20 billion replacement of the Trident nuclear deterrent".

On overall defence spending, he says “a review is absolutely overdue and needed”. It is clear that, in his view, the Trident update should be scrapped. “I find it very hard to see how the current Trident delivery system – the submarines – survives that review. The plan for renewing them strikes me as [wrong]. There’s going to be a very legitimate debate about cheaper means of maintaining a minimum, stripped-down deterrent.” While he accepts that patching up the existing fleet or finding a cheaper, land-based alternative might be needed, he thinks even those options may soon be superfluous.

“Within our working lives, nuclear disarmament may have reached the point where they become redundant. It just looms as too big a cost."


Earlier this year he said in a speech in the House of Lords that the Government would only be procuring three submarines to replace Trident and not four, but this was never confirmed by the Ministry of Defence.