PRIVATISING DEFENCE As in
other sections of the economy, the defence services have been subjected to a wave
of outsourcing and privatisation. Over the past 10 years the trend has been to
contract out to private companies many of the jobs previously done by the military.
The huge increase in private security firms, many of them British, which are enjoying
a bonanza in present-day Iraq, has already been documented. Over 10,000 personnel
employed by them are now in Iraq as well as scattered across the world. Less well
known is the steady increase in the private sector in Britain itself. As of March
2002 forty five PFI deals had been signed bringing £2.3 billion of private
sector capital investment in defence, with at least £7 billion more in the
pipeline. The deals vary from the provision of unit housing for soldiers and their
families, to training the crews of submarines, providing tank transporters to
carry tanks to the battlefield and building 6 RORO ferries in support of Joint
Rapid Reaction Force deployments. More importantly, major military bases
and research facilities have been systematically put up for auction. The Atomic
Weapons Establishment Aldermaston and its partner site at Burghfield are now man 
by
2002 forty five PFI deals had been signed with at least £7 billion more
in the pipeline panies - British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL),
Lockheed Martin and Serco. The Devonport nuclear dockyard, which is currently
refitting Trident submarines, is owned and run by Halliburton (Dick Cheneys
former company). In Scotland, Rosyth Naval Base is now owned and managed by Babcock
International, a British company with a turnover of around £26 million.
In 2002 Babcock also took over many of the functions at the huge Faslane Naval
Base. It now manages all engineering work on submarines and minor surface warships,
provides hotel accomodation on site and runs three naval messes catering for up
to 2500 sailors each day. In addition it operates the Faslane ship-lift. At nearby
Coulport it operates the explosives handling jetty for loading and unloading Trident
warheads as well as providing cleaning services, grounds maintenance and radioactive
waste processing. Many of the other bases and military research facilities
in Scotland were handed over to Qinetiq in 2001 as a Public Private Partnership
project. Qinetiq advertises itself as a defence and security technology company
which is keen to do business across the world. In December 2002, Britains
Defence Minister Lewis Moonie announced that the government had found a strategic
partner in the form of the Carlyle Group to help run the new firm. The Carlyle
Group now owns just over one third of Qinetiq as well as several defence and technology
companies in the US. It is extremely well connected to the Bush administration
and the Republican right. In Scotland Qinetiq manages a string of bases and
research facilities across the country (see Fortress Scotland for a full list). 
private
security firms are enjoying a bonanza in present day Iraq The rapid
penetration of the private sector into all areas of the defence industry and the
operations of the armed forces reflects the growing influence of neo-liberal ideology
in all sectors of the economy. The myth of public bad, private good has become
the New Labour mantra. Yet in health, education and social provision, there is
good evidence that PFI has proved much more expensive than its public sector alternative,
has required major cuts in service provision and has failed to transfer the risks
to the private sector. Now for the first time in the history of the modern nation
state, governments like the US and UK are surrendering one of the essential and
defining attributes of statehood, the states monopoly on the legitimate
use of force. In the past, the private sector profited out of building the materials
of war. Today, it also trains all types of service personnel, including the armies
of foreign powers, and provides huge numbers of private soldiers for combat, occupation
and peacekeeping duties. In time of war, non-military personnel working for private
companies now operate the sophisticated weapons and control systems aboard US
battleships, B-2 stealth bombers and Predator drones. With that 
ministers
participate in champagne brainstorming roundtables and Belgian
beertasting evenings with CEOs from the same companies which are bidding
for PPP/PFI projects. They co-present ideas and papers to defence partnership
conferences. MoD personnel are frequently on the receiving end of corporate hospitality
and, on retirement, can land lucrative directorships with the same firms. The
methods may be more subtle and the bribes less crude, but this cosy relationship
ensures that, at the end of the day, senior civil servants and ministers are caught
in the sticky web of corporate lobbyists and arms salesmen and their integrity
and independence compromised just as easily as if they were Saudi arms dealers
taking huge bribes. Indeed, corporate lobbying by defence-related companies
takes place at all levels of the government, the MoD and the armed services. BAe
Systems chairman (until August 2004) Dick Evans and Tony Blair were described
by BBC journalist Will Self as having an intimate relationship and
with the former having unrivalled access to the British Prime Minister. This has
since been confirmed by former Foreign Secretary Robin Cook in his book The
Point of Departure where he wrote: In my time I came to learn that
the Chairman of British Control of war and foreign policy is steadily
slipping away from elected and accountable government Aerospace appeared
to have the key to the garden door to number 10. Certainly I never once knew Number
10 to come up with any decision that would be incommoding to British Aerospace.
And how that unrivalled access to the Prime Ministers ear has paid dividends.
Time and again the government has intervened using the full power of the British
state to support, promote and, on occasion, cover up arms sales. Its global network
of embassies and defence attaches as well as the visits of government ministers,
MoD officials and even Royal Family members are widely used to promote arms sales.
Add to that BAes boast of commanding the loyalty of at least 200 MPs, its
membership of several domestic and international lobbying groups, the huge hidden
subsidies in the Export Credit Guarantee arrangements which underwrite British
arms contracts across the world and the support for arms sales given by the Defence
Export Services Organisation, and you can get some idea of just how easily the
arms industry has bent the Blair government to its will. 
US-based.
Control of the state instruments of war and foreign policy is steadily slipping
away from elected and accountable government into the hands of a defence
partnership where the real strings of power are pulled by powerful corporations
based in London and New York. So far there has been no public debate about
this large scale erosion of our democratic rights and sovereignty. The peace movement
has a prime responsibility to publicise the extent of private sector penetration
and kick-start that debate. Alan Mackinnon |