ISLAMIC REVOLUTION
For decades Iran and Saudi Arabia were regarded as the twin pillars of
US policy in the Middle East. Their size, geographical position and oil wealth
combined with their corrupt pro-American rulers allowed the United States to hold
sway in the region. But the overthrow of the Shah in Iran's turbulent revolution
changed all that. If the people of Iran are now anti-American it is with
good reason. They well remember the day in 1953 that the CIA carried out the carefully
planned overthrow of their democratically elected president Mohammad Mossadegh
who had dared to nationalise the immensely profitable Anglo-Iranian Oil Company
(later to become BP). These events, described in detail in Stephen Kinzer's book
'All the Shah's Men', ushered in two and a half decades of repression under the
hated Shah. All this ultimately erupted in the Islamic revolution of 1979 which
in turn inspired religious fundamentalists throughout the Moslem world, including
the Taliban and al Qaeda. If Iran is once again a key strategic target of
the new American administration (see Kate Hudson's piece on this page), it is
because it fears that the remaining 'pillar' of its influence in the region -
the Saudi Royal Family - is built on shaky foundations. You can be sure there
will be no sword of 'liberty' directed against the tyrannical Saudi regime where
widespread popular discontent simmers just below the surface. Instead, it is precisely
US power which props it up as the biggest recipient of US arms sales over the
past 20 years and with private US security firms on long term contracts to train
all arms of its security forces. A full scale invasion of Iran may be beyond
current US capabilities, but a future bombing campaign is a prospect which looks
increasingly likely. Alan Mackinnon |